Tim Van Holder wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2002-02-08 at 08:51, Matt Schalit wrote:
> >
> > I'm not experienced with enough platforms to tell why
> > line 5148 in libtool-1.4.2 configure doesn't call grep -e:
> >
> > if { (eval echo configure:5149: \"$archive_cmds 2\>\&1 \| grep \" -lc \" \
> > >/dev/null 2\>\&1\") 1>&5; (eval $archive_cmds 2\>\&1 \| grep \" -lc \" \>/dev/n
> > ull 2\>\&1) 2>&5; }
> >
> >
> >
> > Doesn't grep -e exist on your computers? On my unix box,
> > which is UnixWare 7.1.1, grep -e is required to protect grep
> > from interpreting the -lc as another switch. (grep returns
> > a 2 for syntax error every time with this configure line)
>
> I'll leave that for someone else to answer; I'm guessing its some
> sort of portability issue.
Thank you for the reply. I compiled and installed gnu-grep-2.4.2
and it passed all its tests. I then tried
grep '-lc' make.log
grep -lc make.log
Both fail, but don't return to a prompt, they go into "sleeping"
mode apparently from a truss output I did. I then tried
grep -e -lc make.log
and it works. It's my conclusion that grep -e is the correct syntax.
Too bad I can't get anyone at libtool to care, but as I mentioned
I'm not running Linux. I often get little respect for my OS. I'm
used to it at this point.
> > Please advise. I can't get any response from the bug-libtool
> > list so far, and I'm not sure the best way to fix all six configures
> > that are in that distro. Thanks.
> > Matthew
>
> The proper place will likely be libtool.m4 (provided the problem is in
> a libtool-related configure test); any changes to that file will
> propagate to all configure scripts after running the bootstrap script
> in the top of the libtool tree.
That's the piece of info I was missing. I made a patch for libtool.m4
and used autoconf to recreate configure, but it didn't propogate to all
the subdirectories. Apparently there's some sort of bootstrap script
that you mentioned. Maybe if I download the cvs build, I'll find it
in there? Do people use the same name for the bootstraping script in
general?
I guess you don't really have to answer those, I can figure it out,
but I thought I'd ask. Thanks again,
Matt
