[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > 1. How do i request a C99 compiler? Is there some variation on AC_PROG_CC?
Do never ask for a version declaration, always ask for a feature you need - that is the basic principle of autoconf. Many features being declared as C99 were present in the 1994-version of a compiler too, e.g. { .field: value } was present a long time before in many many compilers - the C99 just made that official. So the question goes back to you - what *feature* do you want? Such a feature test can then be made independent of AC_PROG_CC, well, it would "exit" when the current `cc` or `gcc` does not have the feature you want - or do you want a macro that walks through several installed compilers and chooses the c99-one? Well, that might be another page in the book, gnu hackers are usually okay with finding the gcc being usually the most uptodate... which is why AC_PROG_CC will usually prefer a gcc over vendors'cc when both are there... > > 2. i see a link to "The Official Macro Archive" but it doesn't work. > Is there a mirror somewhere? > you do not mean a link to cryp.to/macro-archive but the link to the GNU Macro Archive at http://www.gnu.org/software/ac-archive - right? A downtime of gnu.org should not happen for long time, but you can get an extended tarball from my branch at http://ac-archive.sf.net but I did not bother lately to upload a gnu.org-lookalike generated from my cvs copy, so it is not exactly the same the gnu.org-tarball named autoconf-archive.tar.gz - I'll schedule to put up a gnu.org lookalike for next week, both as a mirror (for you convenience) and as technical demonstration that the sf.net ac-archive build system includes all features from the gnu ac-archive makefile (which is the case since the branch happens to exist). cheers, -- guido Edel sei der Mensch, hilfreich und gut GCS/E/S/P C++$++++ ULHS L++w- N++@ d(+-) s+a- r+@>+++ y++ 5++X- (geekcode)