Am Mit, 2001-10-31 um 22.22 schrieb Thomas Dickey: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 06:23:46AM -0500, Thomas E. Dickey wrote: > > On 31 Oct 2001, Akim Demaille wrote: > > > > > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > > Thomas> there were claims on this mailing list that 2.50 was 3 times > > > Thomas> faster than 2.13 (so you're saying that 2.52x is ~60 times > > > Thomas> slower than 2.50) > > > > > > Wow! That's quite impressive. Who said that about autoconf? > > > > I may still have it in my email (will look for it tonight). > > sorry - I don't see it in a relevant timeframe (June 2000 to June 2001). > > perhaps I'm recalling an older discussion (or perhaps I discarded that email, > thinking that I would not need to refer to it). FWIW: I once compared autoconf-2.13+automake-1.4 and autoconf-2.49f+automake-1.4 for a large package I am involved into.
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/autoconf/2001-05/msg00157.html Ralf
