On May 21, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but in order to keep backward compatibility, 2.50 should probably just
> stick to what 2.13 said.
> Pavel, Alexandre, what shall we do?
I've been trying for days to find something useful to say about this.
I'm afraid I couldn't come up with anything other than ``well, let's
keep backward compatibility, and document this oddity.'' :-(
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
