Akim Demaille wrote: > > Lars> Is the 2.50 branch set up? > > Akim> There is a tag, autoconf-2_50. > Sorry, but IHMO, there should be a branch. > > Do you people think an FAQ should be in the documentation, or just > kept as a web page? > I do think we need one, ACK. > but should it be shipped? Definitely, IMHO, having a plain text FAQ at the toplevel directory is a _must_, and web-pages and including it into to docs (IMNSHO: == hiding :) ) is not sufficient. Ralf
- Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Akim Demaille
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Akim Demaille
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Pavel Roskin
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Akim Demaille
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Lars J. Aas
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Akim Demaille
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Lars J. Aas
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Akim Demaille
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Ralf Corsepius
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Akim Demaille
- Re: Release Autoconf 2.50 on 19/20 May 2001? Russ Allbery