>>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Corsepius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I _know_ that CPPFLAGS is used both by AC_PROG_CPP and AC_PROG_CC, >> so it seems natural to document it in both or find a means to >> factor it for both. Ralf> Wouldn't AC_REQUIRE-ing a macro containing AC_SUBST(CPPFLAGS) Ralf> from AC_PROG_CC and AC_PROG_CPP remedy this issue? Yep, that's a means to implement the factoring thing I was referring to. Well, I guess we should remain in the safe side, and do this indeed. Nonetheless, I would really appreciate hearing pros/cons for keeping things such as AC_PROG_CPP, AC_PROG_CXXCPP etc. instead of merging them into AC_PROG_CC.
