On Apr 12, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we talking about the same thing? I'm referring to where
> mkinstalldirs, config.guess, etc. will be instead of the top level...
Yeah. What do mkinstalldirs, install-sh, missing, depcomp, ylwrap,
etc have to do with config? They're supporting scripts. So SUP is
more appropriate than CFG or CONFIG, for the very reason that it's
more general.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
