>>>>> "Russ" == Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Russ> Is there any way that the driver scripts could be generated Russ> using M4 so that all the portability junk can be hidden, just Russ> like autoconf lets the end user do for the configure script? That's correct, and that's what Autom4ke is for. That's why m4sugar.m4 and m4sh.m4 were created. But again, Autoconf is addressing portability issues on the user side, not on the maintainer side. Fighting on one front is enough. Today, I feel surrounded.
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Paul Eggert
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Russ Allbery
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Akim Demaille
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Paul Eggert
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Guido Draheim
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Akim Demaille
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Russ Allbery
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Akim Demaille
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Akim Demaille
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Akim Demaille
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Gary V . Vaughan
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Akim Demaille
- Re: Perl vs Scheme vs ML vs ... for autoconf Gary V . Vaughan