>>>>> "Jim" == Jim Meyering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jim> | Jim> Not everyone has a /dev/null. Jim> | Jim> | Huh??? What for instance? Jim> Er... Well, I guess you've caught me :-) I can't name one Jim> offhand. And even if I could, it probably wouldn't be worth Jim> making a change. Well I have an answer to make: Epita doesn't have a good /dev/null. For some obscure insecurity reason related to a bug on NetBSD 1.4.2, we don't have +w on /dev/null!!! Jim> This is just nit-picking, but... how about factoring out that Jim> extra use of `at-devnull' and removing all the useless single Jim> quotes? Very much agreed. I'm applying your suggestion, and will commit it in a couple of minutes.
- autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Harlan Stenn
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Jim Meyering
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Jim Meyering
- RE: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ult... Akim Demaille
- RE: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ult... Tim Van Holder
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Paul Eggert
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ult... Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ult... Harlan Stenn
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Nicolas Joly
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ult... Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Eric Siegerman
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Alexandre Oliva
- Re: autoconf test ': >emtpy' problem under Ultrix Akim Demaille