On Jan 31, 2001, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>> "Markus" == Markus F X J Oberhumer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Markus> After a look through the sources it seems that AS_EXECUTABLE_P Markus> should use both "test -f" and "test -x" on systems that Markus> support it, and "test -f" otherwise (DOS, Win, ...) > Good call, I was going to text ! -x. Huh? How about test -x $f && test ! -d $f ? -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Alexandre Oliva
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Alexandre Oliva
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Alexandre Oliva
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Tim Van Holder
- RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Alexandre Oliva
- RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Richard Dawe
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Earnie Boyd
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Alexandre Oliva
- RE: autoconf 2.49c fails if '.' is in PATH Tim Van Holder