On 26 Oct 2000, Akim Demaille wrote: > >>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas E Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Thomas> Is it true (for a shell) that $0 is always a full pathname? > Thomas> (it could be a relative one, which complicates things a > Thomas> little). > > I've never met any counterexample. A brand lot scripts out there use it. $0 is a full pathname if that's the way the script was invoked (I assume that's what you are saying - if it was not invoked with a full pathname, it really depends on the shell that was used to look up the name of the script). -- T.E.Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://dickey.his.com ftp://dickey.his.com
- Why is srcdir passed as . Ben Woodard
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Mo DeJong
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Alexandre Oliva
- RE: Why is srcdir passed as . Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Lars J. Aas
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Thomas E. Dickey
- RE: Why is srcdir passed as . Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Akim Demaille
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Akim Demaille
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Akim Demaille
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Ben Woodard
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Mo DeJong
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Ben Woodard
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Why is srcdir passed as . Alexandre Oliva
- RE: Why is srcdir passed as . Bernard Dautrevaux
- RE: Why is srcdir passed as . Bernard Dautrevaux