| Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > please, tell me why you want that there are two different means to say | > the same thing? Why do you want both | > | > ./configure --prefix=/foo | > make | > | > and | > | > ./configure | > make prefix=/foo | > | > ? | > | > If the Makefile must support this feature, why should configure accept | > --prefix? | | I use this to configure a package to look for its files in one place | ./configure --prefix=/dir | but install it in another place: | make install prefix=/dir/stow/package | . A GNU program called stow is used to symlink the files installed | in /dir/stow/package to the corresponding locations in /dir. *Please!!!* I am *not* referring to `make install'. I can understand that people use such thing. I am referring to what I wrote above.
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Alexandre Oliva
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation Greg A. Woods
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation lars brinkhoff
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- Re: HTML format documentation Steve Robbins
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Akim Demaille
- [Autoconf] Re: HTML format documentation Greg A. Woods
- Re: HTML format documentation Richard Stallman
- Re: HTML format documentation Alexandre Oliva
- Re: HTML format documentation Paul D. Smith
- Re: HTML format documentation Alexandre Oliva
- Re: HTML format documentation Russ Allbery
- Re: HTML format documentation Greg A. Woods