>>>>> "Pavel" == Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Pavel> Broken preprocessors that always fail or never produce warnings
Pavel> are rejected.
>> Maybe your patch is simplified if you consider AC_PROG_CC has
>> already been run?
Pavel> I don't think so. The preprocessor is tested for different
Pavel> conditions.
Right, but don't you try `$CC -E'? So if AC_PROG_CPP is run after
AC_PROG_CC you don't have to test for gcc -E etc.
Oh, I see: you use ${CC-cc}, like the current AC_PROG_CPP. Sorry for
my misunderstanding.
Pavel> Actually, what I was saying, is that my patch _alone_ should
Pavel> solve the problem with tests, as far as I understand.
Good, thanks!
Pavel> But if you want to merge AC_PROG_CPP anyway, go ahead.
I'll do that once your patch applied.
