On Aug 29, 2000, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> `+' isn't a portable literal. Some implementations seem to use it as >> a meta-character with the usual meaning, but without support for it >> after `*'. > Alexandre, could you be more exact? No. I seem to recall some comments about non-portability of `+', and certainly associated them with this bug report when it came up. In other words, don't pay attention to what I wrote. If Paul said it's ok to assume `+' is not a meta-character in `grep', I believe it. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solv... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solv... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem ... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation pro... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Pavel Roskin
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Paul Eggert
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation... Thomas Dickey
- Re: grep -E ? (Was: Compilation problem solved) Earnie Boyd