On Aug 29, 2000, Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>> `+' isn't a portable literal.  Some implementations seem to use it as
>> a meta-character with the usual meaning, but without support for it
>> after `*'.

> Alexandre, could you be more exact?

No.  I seem to recall some comments about non-portability of `+', and
certainly associated them with this bug report when it came up.  In
other words, don't pay attention to what I wrote.  If Paul said it's
ok to assume `+' is not a meta-character in `grep', I believe it.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                  aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

Reply via email to