> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 12:56:20 -0700 (PDT) > From: Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Most likely, seds that don't support ? and \| also don't support > \{m,n\}, as I recall that those features were introduced to USG Unix > at about the same time. My references indicate otherwise. For example, SunOS 4.x man page for ed(1) clearly says that \{m,n\} is supported, while ? and \| are not. This is consistent with the latter two not being part of BRE. Ken, could you comment on this?
- portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Jim Meyering
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Paul Eggert
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Steve Robbins
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Jim Meyering
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Paul Eggert
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Paul Eggert
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1... Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Ruslan Shevchenko
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Harlan Stenn
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Eli Zaretskii
- Re: portability of sed's \{0,1\}? Ken Pizzini