On Aug 10, 2000, Akim Demaille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yep, I thought about a similar thing, but I find it rather complex.
> In addition, it opens the door to too many dirty tricks
Which is not necessarily a bad thing, IMO :-)
> We have to think about autoupdate too.
Wouldn't it work just the same? I had thought it would, but you
probably know better than I.
> I really don't know. But I confess I no longer want to explore any
> new technology in Autoconf, let's go for this (*&£$ snapshot *now*.
If you say so, go ahead and take the snapshot. It isn't supposed to
be 2.50 final, after all :-)
> I don't have a write access to alpha, could someone put the snapshot
> there then?
My access to the GNU machines has been broken since a security upgrade
of kerberos. I think they figured my access was a security threat :-)
:-)
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
