Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think the common case for almost everyone is "./configure ; make > install" > Doing an install into a different directory than you configured for may > be possible with some packages, but I don't think it is the common case. Yes, but I do it 100% of the time. That's my point. So do most other sites that use AFS, which includes a lot of large educational and commercial institutions. We're rather used to having to deal with broken packages that don't do the right thing, but by and large most GNU software now will cope properly with this. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix and exec_prefix? Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix and exec_pre... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix and exec... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix and ... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix ... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix and exec... Mike Castle
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix and ... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why does ./configure not set prefix ... Russ Allbery
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Mo DeJong
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Russ Allbery
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Tom Tromey
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Mo DeJong
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Russ Allbery
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Tom Tromey
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Alexandre Oliva
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Akim Demaille
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Pavel Roskin
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Russ Allbery
- Re: Why does ./configure not set pr... Pavel Roskin