On Jun 28, 2000, Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you are talking about our internal cygnus documentaiton, I am. Or, actually, Angela was :-) >> And we also have to update the top-level configure to reflect the >> new semantics of --build and --host. > Is that the main argument for reverting back to the old > --host semantics? Nope. There are several arguments. Please read all this thread carefully. -- Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/ Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{cygnus.com, redhat.com} CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org} Free Software Evangelist *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Akim Demaille
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Akim Demaille
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Mo DeJong
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Akim Demaille
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Alexandre Oliva
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Akim Demaille
- Re: --host => cross breaks GCC builds Akim Demaille