Re: IDL dependencies, proposed solution.

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Alex" == Alex Hornby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

Alex> As IDL files use standard C preprocessor syntax for dependent
Alex> inclusion, is it not possible to wrap the idl compile in
Alex> depcomp?

Interesting idea.  I thought different IDL compilers generated
different output file names, though.  Is that not the case?  If it is
the case you'll still need autoconf/automake hackery, I think.

Alex> I think this is really close. Could a depcomp guru please
Alex> confirm or deny? :)

Definitely.

Tom