>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Akim> expr has a bad reputation Paul> Its syntax is awkward -- was that what you were thinking about? Nope, I was referring to the portability. And precisely about the syntax, is `match string expr' portable? Paul> expr is already mentioned in the GNU coding standards as a Paul> utility that you can use. OK, thanks! Paul> if expr "x$ac_package" : '.*[^-a-zA-Z0-9_]' >/dev/null; then My understanding of the `x' here is to avoid problems with $ac_package being a built-in of expr, right? BTW, what is the right spelling? Built-in, builtin, built in. What is the plural? Akim
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patterns Paul Eggert
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patterns Akim Demaille
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patterns Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patt... Akim Demaille
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case ... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported ... Akim Demaille
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsuppor... Thomas E. Dickey
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsuppor... Paul Eggert
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patt... Paul D. Smith
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patterns Paul Eggert
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patt... Akim Demaille
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case ... Paul Eggert
- Re: acgeneral.m4 & unsupported case patterns Earnie Boyd