Re: Is this a bug in autoconf? (patch included)

[Peter Eisentraut]

On 25 Apr 2000, Akim Demaille wrote:

> But if it does make sense, if it does happen that people have a single
> deep configuration tree and they do want to --target it even though it
> makes no sense for some sub packages, then I'll
> s/AC_MSG_ERROR/AC_MSG_WARNING/ my patch.
> 
> Still, for my own education, I would like to be taught why it would
> make sense.

What if one of the sub-packages doesn't even do compilation but only text
manipulation? Say one of the subpackages were Autoconf ... ;)


-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden