Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems clear that the AC_TRY_RUN does not have an argument for > the cross compile case. You mean to do something else in that case? > Can we at least get agreement that this AC_C_BIGENDIAN macro is in > fact broken? I think so. But it's really hard to figure out the endianess of another machine. The only ways of doing that that I can think of is to add a table, have explicit options, or if we can find out from the include files (typically sys/endian.h). /assar
- So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken for cross case Mo DeJong
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken for cr... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken for cr... Assar Westerlund
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken fo... Russ Allbery
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broke... Assar Westerlund
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken fo... Harlan Stenn
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broke... Ben Pfaff
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is b... Mo DeJong
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN... Assar Westerlund
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken fo... Ralf Corsepius
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broke... Assar Westerlund
- Re: So it seems like AC_C_BIGENDIAN is broken for cr... Peter Eisentraut