On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 04:26:45PM +0100, Akim Demaille wrote:
: >>>>> "Lars" == Lars J Aas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: Lars> In my book, this would be
:
: Lars> m4_diversion_reserve([AC_DIVERSION_KILL], -1) ...
:
: Currently diversion are so little used that it'd be an overkill.
:
: How do you want to use diversions to need that many? Is this pure m4,
: or you still think of Autoconf?
I'm just thinking of Autoconf - that's where my own macros have to
cooperate with macros I don't know anything about. Overkill or not,
such a resource management system wouldn't have to be very advanced...
Lars J
