In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Akim Demaille writes: >I'm very OK with changing them. I buy any suggestion of names. >Currently there are four guys: >[...] > s/@PND@/#/g If you ask someone in the UK to draw you a `pound sign' you'll get one of these: `£' (that's the British currency symbol in case something is eating high bits or you aren't reading this in latin1). And in fact the HTML entity `£' refers this character. Anyway, `@PND@' is a poor mnemonic for UK users - perhaps there's a better choice? Is `hash' (@HSH@) a globally recognised name for `#', or is that a UK-only usage? Or `number sign' (@NUM@ or @NMB@)? Not in very common usage here, but at least not ambiguous. Cheers, Olly
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_DEFINE Akim Demaille
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_DEFINE Akim Demaille
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_DEFINE Martin Buchholz
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_DEFINE Martin Buchholz
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_DEFIN... Paul Eggert
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_D... Akim Demaille
- Re: @BKL@, @BKR@, etc. Paul Eggert
- Re: @BKL@, @BKR@, etc. Akim Demaille
- Re: @BKL@, @BKR@, etc. Paul Eggert
- Re: @BKL@, @BKR@, etc. Akim Demaille
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have ... Olly Betts
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't ... Russ Allbery
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't ... Akim Demaille
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_DEFIN... Akim Demaille
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have AC_D... Martin Buchholz
- Re: xemacs configure script doesn't have ... Akim Demaille