Alexandre Oliva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
16 Feb 2000 02:21:44 -0200:
On Feb 16, 2000, NIIBE Yutaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You know, "unknown" does not look good, specifically, it's unclear
> that it is intended or not.
Well, it's used in the exact situation you describe. But you may want
to discuss this with Ben Elliston, the maintainer of
config.{guess,sub}, at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How do one get on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list?
config-patches-request is not recognized by gnu.org.
The GMP package has special needs from config.guess, namely to get
more specific information about the cpu type. For this reason, GMP
has its own config.{guess,sub}.
We would of course like to merge GMP config.{guess,sub} with the real
ones. One thought is to add an option to config.guess enabling some
sort of detailed mode, reporting cpu types. What do you think, would
that be doable?
--linus
