>
> >>>>> "T" == T E Dickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >>
> >>
> >> | yes (NEED is simpler to read than !HAVE).
> >>
> >> One point for NEED, indeed. But you should vote :)
> >>
> >> | #undef $1 | struct zowie { int a; double b; struct zowie *c; char
> >> d; }; | extern struct zowie *$1();
> >>
> >> Why is it that complex? We just
> >>
> >> char *p = (char *) $1;
>
> T> because some compilers won't error on a char* - a struct is better,
> T> and it's complex to make it less likely that it matches an existing
> T> struct.
>
> Could you share your experience on [EMAIL PROTECTED]?
I do on occasion...
>
> Akim
>
--
Thomas E. Dickey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
