Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>>> "Martin" == Martin Buchholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Martin> (XEmacs redefines AC_DEFINE) > Wow, why? XEmacs's configure scripts don't behave like normal configure scripts in a few interesting ways, enough that it doesn't quite "feel" like autoconf to me. But then, XEmacs's build system is amazingly complex. It generally seems to work mostly okay, but it'd be nice if they hadn't gotten quite so custom. -- Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <URL:http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Greg A. Woods
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Tom Tromey
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Greg A. Woods
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Martin Buchholz
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Pavel Roskin
- Re: config.cache considered harm... Akim Demaille
- Re: config.cache considered harmful Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Didier Verna
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Russ Allbery
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Tom Tromey
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Didier Verna
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Russ Allbery
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Akim Demaille
- Re: autoconf is broken in various ways Martin Buchholz