On 2025-01-06 08:55, Antonin Décimo wrote:
Would it be a problem with "regular" compilers if the function was not present in the file specified with -lxxx, but existed in a xxx.lib file (!) in the cwd?
That sounds awkward for everyone else, no? It slows down 'configure' and might run afoul of ".lib" files present for some other purpose.
Can you work around the problem by writing a script wrapper around the compiler in question?
Or file a bug report with clang-cl? It seems odd that it'd support other options with leading minus, but not -l.