On Sat, 13 Sep 2014 08:54:09 -0700, Paul Eggert <[email protected]> wrote: > David A. Wheeler wrote: > > Dale's code is derived from previous FSF code, so I think all the copyright > > issues are addressed. > > That would be true only if Dale's changes, taken as a whole, are > trivial; our rule of thumb for that is about 10 lines of reasonably > obvious changes.
Understood, but FSF also has a copyright assignment from Dale's employer (as I noted earlier). So while Dale's changes are more than 10 lines, that should be fine in this case. --- David A. Wheeler
