Hi Alicja, Thanks for the quick reply! We now consider AUTH48 to be complete. We will begin to prepare this document for publication at this time.
Best regards, Rebecca VanRheenen RFC Production Center > On Sep 15, 2025, at 6:39 AM, Alicja Kario <hka...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Monday, 15 September 2025 08:09:25 CEST, Rebecca VanRheenen wrote: >> Hi Alicja, >> >> Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status >> page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9879). >> >> We have a couple of comments: >> >> 1) For question #2, do you prefer the original, or would like for us to >> update to the text you provided (see below)? Once this has been addressed, >> we will begin to prepare the document for publication. >> >>> so the closest one would be: >>> Unfortunately, [RFC7292] >>> mandates the use of a password-based key derivation >>> function that is specific to PKCS #12 and that PBKDF only allows for >>> change of the underlying message digest >>> function. > > I think the original works well enough. > >> >> 2) You also noted this: >> >>> I don't know the significance of the fact that the included ASN.1 Module >>> addresses one of the errata filed against the RFCs updated by this document. >> >> When a document updates or obsoletes other RFCs, we ask the authors to >> review the errata for those RFCs to ensure that none of the errors appear in >> the current document. In the past, we have encountered instances where >> errata were not addressed or where an erratum was addressed but the erratum >> report itself had not been verified or held for document update. For this >> document, the issue reported in EID 5808 (set as verified) is not repeated >> in this document, so no further action is needed. Thank you for reviewing >> the errata. > > ah, ok, thank you for the explanation! > >> Best regards, >> >> Rebecca VanRheenen >> RFC Production Center >> >> >> >>> On Sep 12, 2025, at 9:49 AM, Alicja Kario >>> <hkario=40redhat....@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: >>> I don't know the significance of the fact that the included ASN.1 Module >>> addresses one of the errata filed against the RFCs updated by this document. >>> I don't think the proposed changes to Introduction actually makes the text >>> clearer. ... >> >> >> > > -- > Regards, > Alicja Kario > Principal Quality Engineer, RHEL Crypto team > Web: www.cz.redhat.com > Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkyňova 115, 612 00, Brno, Czech Republic > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
