Hi All, The IANA actions are now complete.
Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process. We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time. Best regards, RFC Editor/ap > On Jun 12, 2025, at 8:25 AM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > Hi Sabrina, > > The update looks good, thank you! > > RFC Editor/ap > >> On Jun 11, 2025, at 5:22 PM, Sabrina Tanamal via RT <iana-mat...@iana.org> >> wrote: >> >> Hi Alanna, >> >> This update is complete: >> >> https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters >> >> Thanks, >> Sabrina >> >> On Tue Jun 10 22:50:54 2025, apal...@staff.rfc-editor.org wrote: >>> IANA, >>> >>> Please update the "IPv6 Neighbor Discovery Prefix Information Option >>> Flags” registry to capitalize ”preferred flag” in the Description of >>> PIO Option Bit 3. >>> >>> Old: >>> PIO Option Bit Description >>> 3 P - DHCPv6-PD preferred flag >>> >>> New: >>> PIO Option Bit Description >>> 3 P - DHCPv6-PD Preferred Flag >>> >>> Diff file is here: >>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-diff.html >>> >>> Best regards, >>> RFC Editor/ap >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 10, 2025, at 3:48 PM, Alanna Paloma <apal...@staff.rfc- >>>> editor.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Authors, >>>> >>>> David - Thank you for your reply. We have updated the files per the >>>> nits you pointed out. >>>> >>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.xml >>>> >>>> The relevant diff files are posted here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-diff.html (comprehensive >>>> diff) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-auth48diff.html (all >>>> AUTH48 changes) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-lastdiff.html (htmlwdiff >>>> diff between last version and this) >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762-lastrfcdiff.html (rfcdiff >>>> between last version and this) >>>> >>>> And we have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9762 >>>> >>>> All - As we have received all author approvals, we will now ask IANA >>>> to update their registry accordingly. After the IANA updates are >>>> complete, we will move forward with the publication process. >>>> >>>> Thank you, >>>> RFC Editor/ap >>>> >>>>> On Jun 10, 2025, at 10:13 AM, David 'equinox' Lamparter >>>>> <equi...@diac24.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Alanna & all, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jun 05, 2025 at 08:50:55AM -0700, Alanna Paloma wrote: >>>>>> The files have been posted here (please refresh): >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.txt >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.pdf >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.html >>>>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9762.xml >>>>> >>>>> I've reread it and I only noticed one language nit that I'd like to >>>>> raise: >>>>> >>>>> Under "7.2. Using Delegated Prefix(es)" >>>>> >>>>> "The client MAY use the prefix to allow devices directly connected >>>>> to it >>>>> to obtain IPv6 addresses. For example, the client MAY route traffic >>>>> for >>>>> that prefix to **the=>an** interface and send a RA containing a PIO >>>>> for >>>>> the prefix on **the=>that** interface. That interface MUST NOT be >>>>> the >>>>> interface the prefix is obtained from. If the client advertises the >>>>> prefix on an interface and it has formed addresses from the prefix, >>>>> then >>>>> it MUST act as though the addresses were assigned to that interface >>>>> for >>>>> the purposes of Neighbor Discovery and Duplicate Address Detection." >>>>> >>>>> (Note inline marking with **text**) >>>>> >>>>> This is - boiled down - "the interface, the interface, that >>>>> interface >>>>> MUST NOT be the interface obtained from, an interface, that >>>>> interface." >>>>> >>>>> The first 2 "the" are confusing and should be "an" and "that", as is >>>>> done later. The only "the" interface here should be "the interface >>>>> the >>>>> prefix is obtained from". The first 2 references to interfaces are >>>>> the >>>>> same in referring to some other interface as in the 2nd half, where >>>>> (IMHO correctly) "an" and "that" are used. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I don't believe it's absolutely necessary to fix this, I don't see >>>>> it as >>>>> a content/correctness problem, just language that raised a "weird" >>>>> flag >>>>> for me. >>>>> >>>>> Either way: Approved (with or without this edit). >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -David >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> P.S.: I really wasn't sure whether to say something about such a >>>>> tiny >>>>> issue, I hope this doesn't trigger an avalanche... also apologies >>>>> for >>>>> not getting to this earlier :(. >>>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
