Hi, I looked at https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-auth48diff.html Table 6 in section 7.3 and approve.
Take care, G/ -----Original Message----- From: Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2025 1:13 AM To: Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net>; Gunter van de Velde (Nokia) <gunter.van_de_ve...@nokia.com> Cc: RFC Errata System <rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>; pim-...@ietf.org; pim-cha...@ietf.org; s...@venaas.com; auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> Subject: Re: [AD] [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9777 <draft-ietf-pim-3810bis-12> for your review CAUTION: This is an external email. Please be very careful when clicking links or opening attachments. See the URL nok.it/ext for additional information. Hi Brian, Thank you for providing your approval; it is noted on the AUTH48 status page for this document (https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9777). We now await approval from Gunter (for the new text in Table 6 in Section 7.3) before proceeding with publication. Best regards, RFC Editor/kc > On Mar 19, 2025, at 3:30 AM, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> wrote: > > Approved! > >> On Mar 18, 2025, at 8:40 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: >> >> Hi Brian and *Gunter (AD), >> >> Our files have been updated to reflect “source-list” and “filter-mode”. >> Please review and let us know if any further changes are needed or if you >> approve the document in its current form. >> >> *Gunter, please review the added text to Table 6 in Section 7.3 as well as >> the updates made to the terminology (see list below) and let us know if you >> approve. The changes can be reviewed in this file: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-auth48diff.html (see >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.txt to read the text in the Table >> 6 easier). >> >> Terms changed to the latter form: >> Other Querier Present Timeout --> Other Querier Present Interval >> Older Version Host Present Timeout --> Older Version Host Present >> Interval Older Version Querier Present Timeout -- > Older Version >> Querier Present Interval >> >> —Files (please refresh)— >> The updated XML file is here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.xml >> >> The updated output files are here: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.txt >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.pdf >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.html >> >> These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-auth48diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-auth48rfcdiff.html (side >> by side) >> >> These diff files show only the changes made during the last edit round: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-lastdiff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-lastrfcdiff.html (side by >> side) >> >> These diff files show all changes made to date: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-diff.html >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-rfcdiff.html (side by >> side) >> >> Best regards, >> RFC Editor/kc >> >> >>> On Mar 18, 2025, at 7:22 AM, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Karen, >>> All these changes look good. >>> >>> Please make the “source list” —> “source-list” and “filter mode” —> >>> “filter-mode” changes per my response on 9776. >>> >>> Thanks! >>> Brian >>> >>>> On Mar 17, 2025, at 5:53 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Brian, >>>> >>>> Thank you for your reply and clarifications. Our files have been updated >>>> to reflect the following changes: >>>> >>>> - made “filter timer” (when singular) uppercase >>>> - made “query message(s)” uppercase >>>> - added “Report” to the title of Appendix A.1 (e.g., "State-Change >>>> Report Messages”) >>>> - hyphenated “Source List Change Report” (e.g., “Source-List-Change >>>> Report”) >>>> >>>> Please review the changes and let us know if any further updates are >>>> needed or if you approve the document in it’s current form. >>>> >>>> FYI: Questions that were asked in the thread for RFC-to-be 9776 that >>>> pertain to this document: >>>> >>>> 1) Please confirm if all lowercase instances of “filter mode” should be >>>> “filter-mode” in RFC-to-be 9777 for consistency. >>>> >>>> 2) Should all instances of “source list” be “source-list” (the parameter) >>>> in RFCs-to-be 9776 and 9777? >>>> >>>> >>>> —Files (please refresh)— >>>> The updated XML file is here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.xml >>>> >>>> The updated output files are here: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.txt >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.pdf >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777.html >>>> >>>> These diff files show all changes made during AUTH48: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-auth48diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-auth48rfcdiff.html (side >>>> by side) >>>> >>>> These diff files show only the changes made during the last edit round: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-lastdiff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-lastrfcdiff.html (side >>>> by side) >>>> >>>> These diff files show all changes made to date: >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-diff.html >>>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9777-rfcdiff.html (side by >>>> side) >>>> >>>> Best regards, >>>> RFC Editor/kc >>>> >>>> >>>>> On Mar 17, 2025, at 7:26 AM, Brian Haberman <br...@innovationslab.net> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Karen, >>>>> >>>>>> On Mar 14, 2025, at 6:34 PM, Karen Moore <kmo...@staff.rfc-editor.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Brian, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for providing the XML files with updates to the terminology >>>>>> (per the cluster-wide questions) and answers to our questions. We have >>>>>> added further updates based on your replies; the updated files are >>>>>> below. Please see some additional questions/clarifications. >>>>>> >>>>>> 1) Please let us know if you would like to add any keywords (beyond >>>>>> those in the title) for use on https://www.rfc-editor.org/search. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Nothing to add. >>>>> >>>>>> 2) We did not see a reply to this question: >>>>>> >>>>>> Because this document will likely be published at the same time as >>>>>> 3376bis, we have updated the reference to refer to RFC 9776. Please let >>>>>> us know if any corrections are needed. >>>>>> >>>>>> Please consider whether it is appropriate to refer to [BCP57] and >>>>>> [STD100], or if referring to the specific RFCs is preferred. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Given the relationship between the documents, I would suggest keeping the >>>>> reference to 9776. >>>>> >>>>>> 3) In RFCs-to-be 9776 and 9777, “Source Timer” is uppercase when >>>>>> singular; otherwise, the plural form is lowercase. In RFC-to-be 9777, >>>>>> “filter timer” is lowercase in the running text and uppercase in tables. >>>>>> Are any further updates needed for consistency (i.e., make the singular >>>>>> form of “filter timer” uppercase in the running text)? >>>>> >>>>> The singular form should be capitalized as it refers to a specific >>>>> instance. When being referred to in a collection (e.g., source timers), >>>>> we kept it lowercase. Please make it consistent. >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> 4) We hyphenated some instances of “State Change Report” for consistency >>>>>> (e.g., “State-Change Report”). This term is also hyphenated in RFC-to-be >>>>>> 9776. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Correct. >>>>> >>>>>> We also hyphenated “State Change Record” and “State Change Messages”; if >>>>>> that is not preferred, please let us know. Should “State-Change >>>>>> Messages” (title of A.1) perhaps be “State-Change Report Messages”? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Yes, the title of the appendix should be updated as noted. >>>>> >>>>>> 5) In the running text, we updated "MLDv2 Multicast Listener Report” to >>>>>> "Version 2 Multicast Listener Report” (2 instances) to match the “ICMPv6 >>>>>> “type” Numbers" registry >>>>>> <https://www.iana.org/assignments/icmpv6-parameters>. >>>>>> >>>>>> In the running text, we made the following updates (1 instance each) for >>>>>> consistency and to match the registry. If it is not preferred to include >>>>>> the values here, please let us know. >>>>>> >>>>>> Version 1 Multicast Listener Done -> MLDv1 Multicast Listener >>>>>> Done (Type = decimal 132) Version 1 Multicast Listener Report -> >>>>>> MLDv1 Multicast Listener Report (Type = decimal 131) >>>>>> MLDv1 Multicast Listener Report -> MLDv1 Multicast Listener >>>>>> Report (Type = decimal 131) >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> All good changes! >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Brian >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
