Hello Amanda,
Very good catch! Thanks so much. I don't know why nobody until now
caught this, but that's why we have the RFC Editor.
Five n's in both places is fine. The n's in both places is fine. Four
n's in both places would also be fine. Take whatever number you prefer.
Regards, Martin.
On 2025-03-17 17:40, Alice Russo wrote:
Martin,
While preparing this document for publication, we have the following question.
In Section 2.3, may this placeholder be updated to exactly match?
CURRENT
Example: a top-level type of 'oid', leading to types of the form
oid/nnnnn, where nnn is an OID (Object Identifier) designating a
specific media format.
PERHAPS if both are 5 "n"s:
Example: a top-level type of 'oid', leading to types of the form
oid/nnnnn, where nnnnn is an OID (Object Identifier) designating
a specific media format.
Thank you.
RFC Editor/ar
Re:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.xml
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.txt
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.pdf
https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.html
--
Prof. Dr.sc. Martin J. Dürst
Department of Intelligent Information Technology
College of Science and Engineering
Aoyama Gakuin University
Fuchinobe 5-1-10, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara
252-5258 Japan
--
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
