Yes, approved! -MSK, ART AD
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 4:00 AM Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > OK. Thank you for resending the "Fine with me" mail from Arnt, Pete. FWIW, > that mail is not in the auth48archive [1] or my mail. > > Author approvals are complete (as shown on the status page > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9755). > > Murray - OK to proceed with publication? > > Thank you. > RFC Editor/ar > > [1] > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?as=1&email_list=auth48archive&end_date=&q=text%3A%289755%29&qdr=y&start_date= > > > On Mar 13, 2025, at 1:11 PM, Arnt Gulbrandsen <a...@gulbrandsen.priv.no> > wrote: > > > > Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net> writes: > >> On 13 Mar 2025, at 9:18, Alice Russo wrote: > >>> The text in Appendix B.2 has been reverted as requested. The updated > files are at the locations below. At this point, I believe we are awaiting > your reply to the following item. > >> I think he did: > > > > I intended to, but a little more clarity on my part wouldn't have done > any harm. > > > > The new text (also in https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9755.html) > is IMO better. > > > > Arnt > > > On Mar 13, 2025, at 9:44 AM, Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net> wrote: > > > On 13 Mar 2025, at 9:18, Alice Russo wrote: > > > >> Arnt, > >> The text in Appendix B.2 has been reverted as requested. The updated > files are at the locations below. > >> > >> At this point, I believe we are awaiting your reply to the following > item. > >> > >> Pete wrote and I replied: > >>>> I will defer to Arnt if he thinks differently, but I think updating > to the new text from the erratum report seems like a good idea. > >>> > >>> Section 3 has been updated to match the new text on > https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid4029. We'll await word from Arnt > before proceeding. > > > > I think he did: > > > > On 13 Mar 2025, at 4:15, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote: > > > >> Pete Resnick <resn...@episteme.net> writes: > >> Pete and Arnt, what are your views about this errata? > >> > >>> I will defer to Arnt if he thinks differently, but I think updating to > the new text from the erratum report seems like a good idea. > >> > >> Fine with me. > > > > > > -- > > Pete Resnick https://www.episteme.net/ > > All connections to the world are tenuous at best >
-- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
