Hi Sanjay and Erik, We had one more question regarding the following original sentence.
>> 1) <!-- [rfced] Please clarify "(in the sense of URI)" here. Also note that >> we do >> not see "URI" used elsewhere in the document. >> >> Original: >> The Deprecation HTTP response header field is used to signal to >> consumers of a resource (in the sense of URI) that the resource will >> be or has been deprecated. >> --> > > > [sd] it is ok as-is Just so that it's clear to the reader, does "in the sense of URI" mean "identified by a URI"? We'd like to update for clarity if there is no objection. Suggested: The Deprecation HTTP response header field is used to signal to consumers of a resource (identified by a URI) that the resource will be or has been deprecated. Thank you, RFC Editor/st > On Mar 11, 2025, at 8:52 AM, Sarah Tarrant <starr...@staff.rfc-editor.org> > wrote: > > All, > > We have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete: > https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9745 > > Thank you for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process. > > We will move this document forward in the publication process at this time. > > Sincerely, > RFC Editor/st > >> On Mar 11, 2025, at 8:16 AM, Erik Wilde <erik.wi...@dret.net> wrote: >> >> Hello all. >> >> My apologies for the delay. >> >> On 2025-03-11 14:04, Sarah Tarrant wrote: >>> Thank you for your reply. We have marked your approval on the AUTH48 status >>> page for this document (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9745). >>> We will await approvals from each of the parties listed at the AUTH48 >>> status page prior to moving this document forward in the publication >>> process. >> >> I approve as well. >> >> And thanks, @Sanjay, for doing the final round of feedback. >> >> Kind regards, >> >> Erik. >> >> -- >> Erik Wilde | mailto:erik.wi...@dret.net | >> | https://youtube.com/ErikWilde | > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
