Hi Martin, This is a friendly reminder that we await your review.
The files are available here: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.xml https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694.html Comprehensive diffs: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9694-rfcdiff.html (side by side) Thank you, RFC Editor/sg > On Feb 20, 2025, at 12:19 PM, Harald Alvestrand <har...@alvestrand.no> wrote: > > Martin, just giving you the gentle ping of the week. > > -haptics is finished, it's just waiting for you to complete the AUTH48 > process before it can be published. > > Harald > > On 2/12/25 05:05, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> Martin, is there anything further that needs to be reviewed here? Are you >> willing to delegate the final review to the chairs and/or me? >> >> We've gone well past AUTH48, and are somewhere near AUTH1200. :-) We'd >> like to get this moving. >> >> -MSK, ART AD >> >> On Sun, Jan 19, 2025 at 12:26 AM Harald Alvestrand <har...@alvestrand.no> >> wrote: >> >>> On 1/19/25 06:21, Martin J. Dürst wrote: >>>> Hello Harald, >>>> >>>> Thanks for the encouragement. >>>> >>>> On 2025-01-19 07:23, Harald Alvestrand wrote: >>>>> Martin, I have reviewed the diffs and found them to contain nothing >>>>> that changes the meaning of the document. >>>> As far as I have looked, I agree. But I didn't check everything yet. >>>> >>>> Can you please check the following: >>>> >>>> 1) <!-- [rfced] This document updates RFC 6838, which is part of BCP 13 > -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
