Hi Nils, Thanks for the input. We’ll update this in the files when we receive answers to the other questions.
And you’re right - we did mix up the numbers as well! Best regards, RFC Editor/rv > On Jan 31, 2025, at 12:58 PM, Nils Ohlmeier <i...@ohlmeier.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > Only answering number 9 here, because I had discovered the same issue earlier > already https://github.com/wish-wg/webrtc-http-ingest-protocol/pull/216/files > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2025, at 1:29 PM, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org wrote: >> 9) <!-- [rfced] Are the citations for RFC 8445 correct in the following >> sentences? We ask because "ICE" does not appear in RFC 8445. Was the >> intent to cite RFC 8445 (titled "Interactive Connectivity Establishment >> (ICE): A Protocol for Network Address Translator (NAT) Traversal")? >> >> Original: >> ICE [RFC8845] is a protocol addressing the complexities of NAT >> traversal, commonly encountered in Internet communication. >> ... >> Depending on the Trickle ICE support on the WHIP client, the initial >> offer by the WHIP client MAY be sent after the full ICE gathering is >> complete with the full list of ICE candidates, or it MAY only contain >> local candidates (or even an empty list of candidates) as per >> [RFC8845]. >> --> > > I think the numbers are also mixed up in your question up there :-) > But yes please replace these two occurrences of RFC 8845 with RFC 8445 as > shown above in the GitHub pull request. > > Best regards > Nils Ohlmeier -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
