Daniel, The document has been updated accordingly. (The last change is fine because the term now matchs the referenced document [research.jcs_14].) The revised files are here (please refresh): https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.txt https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.pdf https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.xml
This diff file shows all changes from the approved I-D: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-rfcdiff.html (side by side) This diff file shows the changes made during AUTH48 thus far: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-auth48diff.html https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-auth48rfcdiff.html (side by side) This diff file shows only the changes since the last posted version: https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-lastrfcdiff.html We will wait to hear from J. Bradley and A. Labunets before continuing the publication process. This page shows the AUTH48 status of your document: https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9700 Thank you. RFC Editor/ar > On Jan 28, 2025, at 12:17 PM, Daniel Fett <m...@danielfett.de> wrote: > > Hi Alice, > > While we're waiting for the other coauthors to approve, I was notified of a > few minor editorial things that escaped our attention, please see the > attached PDF. > > I support the suggested change to "redirection URI". For the last item, I'm > not sure what's correct and trust your knowledge :-) > > Thanks, > Daniel > > Am 27.01.25 um 21:05 schrieb Alice Russo: >> Daniel, >> >> Thank you for letting us know. We have recorded your approval on the AUTH48 >> status page ( >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9700 >> ). We updated the date on the document to 'January 2025'. >> >> We await word from your coauthors before continuing the publication process. >> >> The files are here: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.txt >> >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.pdf >> >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.html >> >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700.xml >> >> >> Diff of all changes from the I-D: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-diff.html >> >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-rfcdiff.html >> (side by side) >> >> Diff of the changes made during AUTH48: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-auth48diff.html >> >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-auth48rfcdiff.html >> (side by side) >> >> Diff of only the most recent changes: >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-lastdiff.html >> >> >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9700-lastrfcdiff.html >> (side by side) >> >> Thank you. >> RFC Editor/ar >> >> [FYI, new email address: >> aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org >> ] >> >> >>> On Jan 27, 2025, at 10:02 AM, Daniel Fett <m...@danielfett.de> >>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Alice, >>> >>> Today, we were finally able to discuss the potential addition to this >>> document in the working group. There was a consensus in the call that we >>> will not add anything to the document. >>> >>> I therefore give my "go" for publication. >>> >>> Thank you, >>> Daniel >>> >>> Am 20.12.24 um 01:18 schrieb Alice Russo: >>> >>>> Daniel, >>>> Checking in on this document; any update on the normative change? >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> RFC Editor/ar >>>> > <Suggested Changes to OAuth Security BCP (Typos).pdf> -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
