Unfortunately urldefense has made such a dog's dinner that it's almost 
impossible to review the changes in this email.

Instead I reviewed the diffs:
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-diff.html
    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9710-rfcdiff.html

My comments in blue, with quoting in black, red, and green.


Section 4, title:

4.  Update the Description Descriptions in the IANA Registry



Is it sufficiently clear which registry this refers to?

Given the comments below, should it say Update the Descriptions in the "IPFIX 
Information Elements" Registry or similar?


Section 5, first paragraph and Table 1:


"EltID" is short for "ElementID".)

"ID" would be better.


Table 1, last entry (346)

https://www.iana.org/assignments/

A leading [ is missing from this URL. Compare it with the rows above.


6.22.2. NEW

    Values are listed in the "mibCaptureTimeSemantics (Value 448)"
    registry.

Additional Information:  Values are listed in the
   "mibCaptureTimeSemantics (Value 448)" registry.

To avoid repeating this text, and for consistency with 6.23.2. and 6.24.2, 
change the "Additional Information" to:

See the "mibCaptureTimeSemantics (Value 448)" registry 
[https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix].


10.2. Informative References

Please sort the RFCs numerically rather than alphabetically, so that 768 and 
791 come first.


P.




On 27/01/25 17:05, 
mohamed.boucad...@orange.com<mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com> wrote:

Hi all, 5.  Point to An Existing IANA Registry

(adding Paul (DE), fwiw)

Thank you for sharing the edited version.

Please see inline. I let Benoît (and Paul) further comment as appropriate.

Cheers,
Med



-----Message d'origine-----
De : rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> 
<rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org><mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>
Envoyé : vendredi 24 janvier 2025 20:28
À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET 
<mohamed.boucad...@orange.com><mailto:mohamed.boucad...@orange.com>;
benoit.cla...@huawei.com<mailto:benoit.cla...@huawei.com>
Cc : i...@iana.org<mailto:i...@iana.org>; 
rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org>; opsawg-
a...@ietf.org<mailto:a...@ietf.org>; 
opsawg-cha...@ietf.org<mailto:opsawg-cha...@ietf.org>; 
thomas.g...@swisscom.com<mailto:thomas.g...@swisscom.com>;
mjethanand...@gmail.com<mailto:mjethanand...@gmail.com>; 
auth48archive@rfc-editor.org<mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Objet : Re: AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9710 <draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-
fixes-12> for your review


[resending with IANA CC'ed as intended.]

Authors,

While reviewing this document during AUTH48, please resolve (as
necessary) the following questions, which are also in the XML
file.

1) <!-- [rfced] Regarding the NEW text that appears throughout
this document, we have updated it to include the registry name
followed by the URL to the registry group.  Based on discussion
with IANA, this was the preferred way to refer to these
registries in the RFC.  Note that the extended URLs remain in the
OLD text, as it does not matter if these links cease to work in
the future (they are marked OLD).

For example: Section 6.2.2

Original:
   Additional Information: See the Classification Engine IDs
registry

([https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F__;JSU!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WJ8leu_Y$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.b
oucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a2
0af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098216920%7CUnknown
%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOi
JXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=wq9
9btmlG0W3ycYItq2iJe%2BdwNsgV9taHEVaehZZx5I%3D&reserved=0
      ipfix.xhtml#classification-engine-ids]).

Current:
   Additional Information: See the "Classification Engine IDs
(Value
      101)" registry
[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca
dair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af3
4b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098231699%7CUnknown%7CT
WFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW
4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=GmzQ%2B
t%2BJvct8Y9lKN%2F5WfQvzaMLKK9YoV5n%2ByF9vXck%3D&reserved=0].
-->




[Med] Works for me. Thanks.




2) <!--[rfced] FYI, similarly Table 1 has been updated to use the
registry name and the URL without the URI fragment, per IANA's
preference for RFCs.

For example: "Additional Information" for 33 igmpType.

Original I-D:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%4
0orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bf
bc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098240525%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ
sb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIs
IkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xBp%2F3SChrFi
%2Bt6phY2PO40s5lrVrZequtIKJRnuDjJU%3D&reserved=0
   igmp-type-numbers/igmp-type-
   numbers.xhtml#igmp-type-numbers-1

Current document:
   See "IGMP Type Numbers" at

[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%
40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40b
fbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098249743%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbG
Zsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiI
sIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=luCubW7cYwHT
O5gJYNNoBFIb9reoRV1rMGRDjALYXTI%3D&reserved=0
   igmp-type-numbers]

Current IANA registry (we will send a request to update to the
registry name):
   See the assigned IGMP type numbers at

[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Figmp-type-
numbers%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d7204
46a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0
%7C0%7C638733438098258036%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGk
iOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldU
IjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=NJJ0E3T2B1EwYApUawm9Y8%2F0rpiYJlM
pihl0vBD7JOI%3D&reserved=0
   igmp-type-numbers.xhtml#igmp-type-numbers-1]

Note: Table 1 currently uses Form A, but if you prefer Form B,
please let us know.

Form A: See "Name" at [URL]
Form B: See the "Name" registry at [URL]



[Med] Please use Form B for consistency through the document. Thanks.



-->


3) <!-- [rfced] Section 6.1.2: To which registry does "IPFIX MPLS
label type registry" refer? We see the following registries at
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fmpls-label-
values&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4
b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
%7C638733438098265300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR
ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy
fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=EWnB8fcZSmxDFf3GfEjn7taSyCzNbWDnuNUU%
2Fc4zJRQ%3D&reserved=0:

    "Base Special-Purpose MPLS Label Values"
 or "Extended Special-Purpose MPLS Label Values"

Original:
   Additional Information:  See the IPFIX MPLS label type
registry

([https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F__;JSU!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WJ8leu_Y$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fmpls-label-
values&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4
b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0
%7C638733438098272852%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnR
ydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoy
fQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=31r%2B3w05U4eCf2QBdHa9KsHHN2EcUL1Wfeh
WALJQG10%3D&reserved=0]).
-->




[Med] The link should be 
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.iana.org/assignments/ipfix/ipfix.xhtml*ipfix-mpls-label-type__;Iw!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDgia_Bk$
 [iana[.]org].




4) <!-- [rfced] Because it seems the pointers to the relevant
registry were moved from the "Description" to "Additional
Information", do you still want to keep the sentence about where
the values are listed in the "Description"?
It seems redundant in some cases; please review.

Examples of sentences that you may want to cut from NEW
Descriptions:

S 6.2.2
      Values for this field are listed in the Classification
Engine IDs registry.

S 6.3.2
      Values are listed in the flowEndReason registry.

S 6.4.2
      Values are listed in the natOriginatingAddressRealm
registry.

S 6.5.2
      Values for this Information Element are listed in the "NAT
Event
      Type" registry.
-->



[Med] I guess I prefer to keep those.





5) <!-- [rfced] The following text was included as a note for
IANA.  We have removed the text.  Please let us know if this is
incorrect.

              <t>Note to IANA: This change also corrects errors
in the pointers provided for NAT46/NAT64.</t>
-->



[Med] Thanks.





6) <!-- [rfced] Section 6.12.2: We are unable to find an
informationElementDataType registry on iana.org. From discussion
with IANA, it seems "[informationElementDataType] subregistry"
was renamed "IPFIX Information Element Data Types" at some point.
Assuming this is true, please consider the following updates.

Original:
6.12.2.  NEW

   Description:  A description of the abstract data type of an
IPFIX
      information element.These are taken from the abstract data
types
      defined in Section 3.1 of the IPFIX Information Model
[RFC5102];
      see that section for more information on the types
described in
      the [informationElementDataType] subregistry.  These types
are
      registered in the IANA IPFIX Information Element Data Type
      subregistry.

      The [informationElementDataType] subregistry is intended to
assign
      numbers for type names, not to provide a mechanism for
adding data
      types to the IPFIX Protocol, and as such requires a
Standards
      Action [RFC8126] to modify.

   Additional Information:  See the IPFIX Information Element
Data Types
      registry
([https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F__;JSU!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WJ8leu_Y$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.b
oucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a2
0af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098280659%7CUnknown
%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOi
JXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=fZT
qMgUWdeawVC97Zcs0W%2FAxUOKHXF72NDlig4H5Pts%3D&reserved=0
      ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-information-element-data-types]).


Perhaps:
6.12.2.  NEW

   Description:  A description of the abstract data type of an
IPFIX
      information element.These are taken from the abstract data
types
      defined in Section 3.1 of the IPFIX Information Model
[RFC5102];
      see that section for more information on the types
described in
      the "IPFIX Information Element Data Types" registry
(previously the
      "informationElementDataType" subregistry).  These types are
      registered in the "IPFIX Information Element Data Types"
      registry.

      The "IPFIX Information Element Data Types" registry is
intended to assign
      numbers for type names, not to provide a mechanism for
adding data
      types to the IPFIX Protocol; as such, modifications require
Standards
      Action [RFC8126].

   Additional Information:  See the "IPFIX Information Element
Data Types"
      registry
[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bo
ucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20
af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098288750%7CUnknown%
7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJ
XaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Vq8v
EFpo9%2BQOFPrtg0K5fWkYS9hAUUcQ6%2FvlWsjYm3Q%3D&reserved=0].
-->



[Med] Looks good.





7) <!-- [rfced] Section 6.13.2: We updated the registry title to
refer to the "IPFIX Information Element Semantics" registry,
instead of the name of the registry group ("IP Flow Information
Export (IPFIX) Entities" registry group).  Please confirm this is
correct.

Original:
   Additional Information:  See the IP Flow Information Export
(IPFIX)
      Entities registry
([https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F__;JSU!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WJ8leu_Y$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
%2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.b
oucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a2
0af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098296172%7CUnknown
%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOi
JXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=RUx
IUNMNspxE61EY92cciHQ%2FAxRUSFqwFa9wb7bUimI%3D&reserved=0
      ipfix.xhtml#ipfix-information-element-semantic]).

Current:
   Additional Information:  See the "IPFIX Information Element
      Semantics" registry
[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca
dair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af3
4b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098303554%7CUnknown%7CT
WFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW
4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LK7xneV
fcy5iYFno4EspXKtrCqcB75%2FSP%2Fp0Kwp1XR4%3D&reserved=0].
-->



[Med] ACK





8) <!-- [rfced] Section 6.14.1: We are unable to find an
informationElementsUnits registry on iana.org.  We believe the
informationElementsUnits subregistry was renamed as "IPFIX
Information Element Units" registry at some point. Please confirm
this is correct.



[Med] ACK.

  Assuming this is true, please consider the


following updates.

Original:
6.14.2.  NEW

   Description:  A description of the units of an IPFIX
Information
      Element.  These correspond to the units implicitly defined
in the
      Information Element definitions in Section 5 of the IPFIX
      Information Model [RFC5102]; see that section for more
information
      on the types described in the informationElementsUnits
      subregistry.  These types can take the values in the [IANA
IPFIX
      Information Element Units] subregistry.  The special value
0x00
      (none) is used to note that the field is unitless.

   Additional Information:  See the IPFIX Information Element
Units
      registry ([IANA IPFIX Information Element Units]).


Perhaps:
6.14.2.  NEW

   Description:  A description of the units of an IPFIX
Information
      Element.  These correspond to the units implicitly defined
in the
      Information Element definitions in Section 5 of the IPFIX
      Information Model [RFC5102]; see that section for more
information
      on the types described in the "IPFIX Information Element
Units" registry
      (previously the informationElementsUnits subregistry).
These types
      can take the values in the "IPFIX Information Element
Units" registry.
      The special value 0x00 (none) is used to note that the
field is unitless.

   Additional Information:  See the "IPFIX Information Element
Units"
      registry
[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca
dair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af3
4b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098311017%7CUnknown%7CT
WFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW
4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=552TXTV
VATp51z68kz140N%2BRbJ2k2p6Eag1DzuqEyBI%3D&reserved=0].
-->



[Med] ACK.





9) <!-- [rfced] Section 6.14.2 (NEW for informationElementUnits):
FYI, if you accept the suggested text in the previous question,
we will ask IANA to remove the following sentence from the
registry; it is not part of the proposed new text.

    Original:
      These types can take the values in the [IANA IPFIX
Information Element Units]
      subregistry.
-->



[Med] Not sure about this one. Do you mean this text "These types are 
registered in the [IANA IPFIX Information Element Units] subregistry.", instead?





10) <!-- [rfced] Section 7.3: It is unclear why there are hyphens
after destination and source in the tables.  We see the OLD text
appears in RFC 6235, and it does not include hyphens.  The
hyphens also are not used in RFC 5103.

For example:
   destination- Information
   (i.e., source- or destination-) Information Element
   destination- element

Should the hyphens be removed? For example:
  destination Information
  (i.e., source or destination) Information Element
  destination element
-->




[Med] I also think so. OK to change this as well in the NEW. Thanks.




11) <!-- [rfced] We removed the reference to [Forwarding-Status]
because IANA updated their registry with the link.  We updated
the text to include the registry title name and the URL to the
registry group, based on discussion with IANA.  Currently,
[Forwarding-Status] only appears in the OLD text.  Please review.

   [Forwarding-Status]
              IANA, "Forwarding Status (Value 89)",

<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bo
ucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20
af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098318318%7CUnknown%
7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJ
XaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UaYV
5lhrR5Ddi7cBmhVnVRh37ptSNNejzjS9bcInD3U%3D&reserved=0
              
ipfix.xhtml#forwarding-status><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$[eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098318318%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=UaYV5lhrR5Ddi7cBmhVnVRh37ptSNNejzjS9bcInD3U%3D&reserved=0ipfix.xhtml#forwarding-status>.

Section 4.3.2 original:
    - Additional Information: See "NetFlow Version 9 Flow-Record
Format"
              [CCO-NF9FMT]. See the Forwarding Status sub-
registries
              at [Forwarding-Status].

Current:
   Additional Information:  See "NetFlow Version 9 Flow-Record
Format"
      [CCO-NF9FMT].  See the "Forwarding Status (Value 89)"
registry at

[https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.iana.org%2Fassignments%2Fipfix&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.bouca
dair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af3
4b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098325669%7CUnknown%7CT
WFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW
4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=N9TVtGq
hPGoMxyN5JXujrV4aJKgNTf1qPN4pqDfMV60%3D&reserved=0].
-->



[Med] ACK





Thank you.

RFC Editor


On Jan 24, 2025, rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> 
wrote:

*****IMPORTANT*****

Updated 2025/01/24

RFC Author(s):
--------------

Instructions for Completing AUTH48

Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed
and approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an
RFC.
If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
available as listed in the FAQ
(https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fwww.rfc-
editor.org%2Ffaq%2F&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com
%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6
f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098332916%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbX
B0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWF
pbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=63evOdWdkBjJsng08zKfSv1X
RukO6RXHI9xy3R79R24%3D&reserved=0).

You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
(e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before
providing your approval.

Planning your review
---------------------

Please review the following aspects of your document:

*  RFC Editor questions

  Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC
Editor
  that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
  follows:

  <!-- [rfced] ... -->

  These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.

*  Changes submitted by coauthors

  Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
  coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
  agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.

*  Content

  Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
  change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular
attention to:
  - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
  - contact information
  - references

*  Copyright notices and legends

  Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
  RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
  (TLP -
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Ftrustee.ietf.org%2Flicense-
info&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b2
40ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7
C638733438098340318%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRyd
WUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ
%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=xXvNIQIRB86P6xGnBsu3Q6qvrTGS0v6uGZ2ydAH
Gl7M%3D&reserved=0).

*  Semantic markup

  Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that
elements of
  content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that
<sourcecode>
  and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at

<https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
2Fauthors.ietf.org%2Frfcxml-
vocabulary&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d7204
46a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0
%7C0%7C638733438098347372%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGk
iOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldU
IjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pv%2B%2BY%2FPpP1hlXvGo1uonaNXj3Me
Nj%2FNe4%2BrNY8JJUTs%3D&reserved=0><https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WDhniwjZ$[eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]2Fauthors.ietf.org%2Frfcxml-vocabulary&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098347372%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=pv%2B%2BY%2FPpP1hlXvGo1uonaNXj3MeNj%2FNe4%2BrNY8JJUTs%3D&reserved=0>.

*  Formatted output

  Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
  formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file,
is
  reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
  limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.


Submitting changes
------------------

To submit changes, please reply to this email using 'REPLY ALL'
as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes.
The parties
include:

  *  your coauthors

  *  rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-edi...@rfc-editor.org> (the RPC team)

  *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
     IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
     responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).

  *  auth48archive@rfc-editor.org<mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>, which 
is a new archival
mailing list
     to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active
discussion
     list:

    *  More info:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fmsg%2Fietf-announce%2Fyb6lpIGh-
4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%
7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f
5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098355083%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB
0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFp
bCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=HycPZKNvK0DTPrJAf1loEFiz5
0agXLW8eilfWEmRdGA%3D&reserved=0

    *  The archive itself:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fmailarchive.ietf.org%2Farch%2Fbrowse%2Fauth48archive%2F&data=05%
7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3
cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098
362462%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLj
AuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C
%7C%7C&sdata=BeFHgeIKja0%2F5UyCO2KiWexwnoBeBAnOTf75XemYc4E%3D&res
erved=0

    *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily
opt out
       of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive
matter).
       If needed, please add a note at the top of the message
that you
       have dropped the address. When the discussion is
concluded,
       auth48archive@rfc-editor.org<mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org> will 
be re-added to the CC
list and
       its addition will be noted at the top of the message.

You may submit your changes in one of two ways:

An update to the provided XML file
- OR -
An explicit list of changes in this format

Section # (or indicate Global)

OLD:
old text

NEW:
new text

You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an
explicit list of changes, as either form is sufficient.

We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes
that seem beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text,
deletion of text, and technical changes.  Information about
stream managers can be found in the FAQ.  Editorial changes do
not require approval from a stream manager.


Approving for publication
--------------------------

To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email
stating that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use
'REPLY ALL', as all the parties CCed on this message need to see
your approval.


Files
-----

The files are available here:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-
editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710.xml&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada
ir%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b
40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098369591%7CUnknown%7CTWF
pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4z
MiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=PKy9epb1f
1mrOJweMy7CO7LavXnYkgsgx2S4Oc6YZ8w%3D&reserved=0

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-
editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucad
air%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34
b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098376710%7CUnknown%7CTW
FpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4
zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mFxWs6Om
K%2BWfF4vr4USMx2Y1C%2BC5OuCHcImrq3put7g%3D&reserved=0

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-
editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710.pdf&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada
ir%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b
40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098384059%7CUnknown%7CTWF
pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4z
MiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FHhYiCBmd
9evKeiU8gsX309Nv%2FwVo5KuzAjKq7L8bXI%3D&reserved=0

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-
editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710.txt&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucada
ir%40orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b
40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098391054%7CUnknown%7CTWF
pbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4z
MiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IByqV24NK
nFieSEfjVoNhD778RtXRwQ5nv19FRLXY6k%3D&reserved=0

Diff file of the text:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710-
diff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d72044
6a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%
7C0%7C638733438098413300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGki
OnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUI
joyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=LlDJvAnpyJOryU9%2BzK5b7mC%2FBqPFnQ
ljsSgr2df4AWQ%3D&reserved=0

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710-
rfcdiff.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d72
0446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%7
C0%7C0%7C638733438098422900%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hc
GkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIl
dUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IOs2ipD6gNda3cPc46gVjKcFMpFvgIB
DDzpFF5tGx9k%3D&reserved=0 (side by side)

Diff of the XML:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-editor.org%2Fauthors%2Frfc9710-
xmldiff1.html&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40orange.com%7C7d7
20446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfbc48b9253b6f5d20%
7C0%7C0%7C638733438098430551%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1h
cGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsI
ldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FN%2Bhfw2PF6%2BcnotzkkBCFL71pk
lEIxBcZPgv2WdIn34%3D&reserved=0


Tracking progress
-----------------

The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:

https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https*3A*2F*2__;JSUl!!OSsGDw!PTFTSCJ7ozWC7Q2JLAv29uz-PgK4vkB3Bi7C7KVyHO7JG3dOodyHmHqTiLSqfiWgGPS9WfD4yLejUyY-WKiOgGl4$
 [eur03[.]safelinks[.]protection[.]outlook[.]com]
Fwww.rfc-
editor.org%2Fauth48%2Frfc9710&data=05%7C02%7Cmohamed.boucadair%40
orange.com%7C7d720446a4b240ac3b6408dd3cad7839%7C90c7a20af34b40bfb
c48b9253b6f5d20%7C0%7C0%7C638733438098438132%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
b3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsI
kFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=E0x%2FHML4LJqg
0bWNl67yXjQ2Y%2Fp2xWnW6iCqvlji%2Fl4%3D&reserved=0

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Thank you for your cooperation,

RFC Editor

--------------------------------------
RFC9710 (draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-fixes-12)

Title            : Simple Fixes to the IP Flow Information Export
(IPFIX) Entities IANA Registry
Author(s)        : M. Boucadair, B. Claise
WG Chair(s)      : Henk Birkholz, Joe Clarke
Area Director(s) : Warren Kumari, Mahesh Jethanandani


____________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.



-- 
auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org

Reply via email to