Joe, Thank you for your reply. The files have been updated accordingly, and the document will be published shortly.
RFC Editor/ar > On Jan 24, 2025, at 12:17 PM, Joe Abley <jab...@cloudflare.com> wrote: > > On 24 Jan 2025, at 20:56, Alice Russo <aru...@staff.rfc-editor.org> wrote: > >> RRSet vs. RRset: This document uses both forms (2 instances each; pasted >> below). >> >> RRset (lowercase 's') is much more common in RFCs. > > And it's also what is used in RFC 9499, I see. Which surprised me because I > thought "RRSet" was what we had decided was right. > > I don't think it matters which we use so long as we are consistent. I think > there's no reason not to follow common usage and 9499 though. > >> May we change the 2 instances to match common usage (and the later instances >> within 9718), even though the capital 'S' was used in RFC 7958? > > I think yes. > >> A reply from one author is sufficient at this stage. > > Ok. Hopefully none of my more-engaged co-authors think differently :-) > > > Joe -- auth48archive mailing list -- auth48archive@rfc-editor.org To unsubscribe send an email to auth48archive-le...@rfc-editor.org
