Am 15.03.26 um 18:13 schrieb Pasha Finkelshtein:
I don't care about the package, but you're factually incorrect;
everything is pushed there:
❯
tree -a fuck
fuck
├──
f-bomb-1.0.0.tar.gz
├──
fuck-1.0.0-1-any.pkg.tar.zst
├──
.git
// internals ├── PKGBUILD └── .SRCINFO
This is obviously not the right way to publish a package, and I'm not
sure why it's not visible on the web (it isn't). But all the necessary
files are there.
Best,
Pasha
On Sun, 15 Mar 2026 at 16:55, Ronan Hevenor <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to request deletion of the AUR repo "fuck" (https://
aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=fuck <https://
aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/log/?h=fuck>).
The repo was created by eshnd in September 2025 with three throwaway
commits ("test", "added all", "/"). No valid PKGBUILD or .SRCINFO
was ever pushed, so the package doesn't appear in AUR search or have
a package page. It's effectively a name squat on an empty repo.
I have a legitimate package I'd like to publish under this name.
Thanks,
Ronan
Leaving the choice of name aside...
There were deletion requests six months ago.
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/O4S2Q25H3EJRGKYVNHVEUQ7J4S6Z6GPK/
https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/PFHUBD5ITYA5BBOVJRXAOHNSW3B5ZB2E/
Didn't look up the confirmation, but the way deletion requests work they
remove it from the aurweb (which is the case), but the corresponding
repo is not removed (which is why it can be still be viewed/cloned).
Best regards
