I agree with you :) I won't let attempting to be perfect stand in the way
of being useful.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2024, 01:00 Ikumi Keita <ik...@ikumi.que.jp> wrote:
> Hi Leo,
>
> >>>>> Leo Stein <leo.st...@gmail.com> writes:
> > Probably not, but I didn't want to make any assumptions. One example
> might
> > be that a user includes a comment just before/after their
> > \graphicspath{...} command, reminding themselves of the syntax, e.g.
>
> > % The syntax for \graphicspath is \graphicspath{{path1/}{path2/}{path3/}}
> > \graphicspath{{figs/}{../scripts/figs/}}
>
> > I now realize that even the \graphicspath command inside the comment will
> > be parsed. Should it be ignored?
>
> > I think that LaTeX won't mind extra whitespace or ignored comments
> inside a
> > graphicspath command, e.g.
>
> > \graphicspath{%
> > {figs/} % my handmade figures
> > {../scripts/figs/} % figures generated by my analysis code
> > }
>
> > but my current regex won't match this example.
>
> Yes, the proposed code doesn't ignore commented \graphicspath, and
> doesn't deal with whitespaces and comments between the outer braces. I
> think we can still live with it as preliminary work. Don't worry, there
> are tons of such simplifications in the current AUCTeX code. But if you
> want to elaborate it further, you can take your time.
>
> Regards,
> Ikumi Keita
> #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
> #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
>
