Arash Esbati <ar...@gnu.org> writes: > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > diff --git a/GNUmakefile b/GNUmakefile > index 73bdeace..617daea1 100644 > --- a/GNUmakefile > +++ b/GNUmakefile > @@ -106,8 +106,8 @@ LASTVERSION:=$(shell grep "^;; Version:" auctex.el \ > AUCTEXVERSION:=$(if > $(THISVERSION),$(THISVERSION),$(LASTVERSION).$(AUCTEXDATE)) > > tex-site.el: tex-site.el.in > - sed -e 's|@lisppackagelispdir@|(file-name-directory load-file-name)|'\ > - -e 's|@lisppackagedatadir@|(file-name-directory load-file-name)|'\ > + sed -e 's|@lisppackagelispdir@|(directory-file-name > (file-name-directory load-file-name))|'\ > + -e 's|@lisppackagedatadir@|(directory-file-name > (file-name-directory load-file-name))|'\ > -e 's|@lispautodir@|(if (file-writable-p "/usr/local/var/auctex") > "/usr/local/var/auctex" "~/.emacs.d/auctex")|'\ > -e 's|@AUCTEXVERSION@|$(AUCTEXVERSION)|'\ > -e 's|@AUCTEXDATE@|$(AUCTEXDATE)|'\ > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > WDYT? This was also discussed in bug#31150.
Looks good. > And I see the files .dir-locals.el and .elpaignore are also installed. > Are they really necessary, or can they be excluded? .elpaignore can be ignored. I'd keep .dir-locals.el in case someone wants to create a patch by modifying the installed el files. Bye, Tassilo
