Jeremy Bryant <j...@jeremybryant.net> writes: > Great, this seems to be a major obstacle removed!
That was a good change also for other reasons -- kudos to Keita for doing it. > Again, this only works if users are provided with general network > access. Depending on site policy, this is sometimes not permitted, > hence my original question. I see the point, but I'm not sure if that justifies putting AUCTeX and all other ELPA packages into core -- this is for Emacs maintainers to judge. > Good to know. I agree this is a worthy goal. > > Was the main blocker checking on FSF copyright assignment? Or was it > the hooks renaming as above? FSF assignment is not an issue, AUCTeX wouldn't be available on GNU ELPA otherwise. The major mode names was an issue, but I think more importantly, it wasn't high on our and Emacs developers list -- all seemed happy with what we have. Best, Arash
