Hi Arash,
>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes:
> This is my next approximation:
> diff --git a/tex.el b/tex.el
> index c4e4104e..a0649c73 100644
> --- a/tex.el
> +++ b/tex.el
> @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ If nil, none is specified."
> ("Ps2pdf" "ps2pdf %f %(O?pdf)" TeX-run-ps2pdf nil
> (plain-TeX-mode LaTeX-mode docTeX-mode AmSTeX-mode Texinfo-mode)
> :help "Convert PostScript file to PDF")
> + ("LaTeXMK" "latexmk -recorder %(latexmk-out) %(file-line-error) \
I think we can omit "-recorder" option. It seems that Latexmk adds
"-recorder" option to latex command by default. The reason why I put
"-recorder-" in my proposal was to suppress that option; when %l
expansion includes "\input", Latexmk puts "-recorder" between "\input"
and .tex file name when it invokes latex, which leads to error.
(I forgot to mention this in my previous message, sorry.)
> Reg. this part:
> + ;; FIXME: This might be inaccurate:
> + ((and TeX-PDF-mode
> + (string=3D (TeX-PDF-from-DVI) "Dvipdfmx"))
> + " -pdfdvi")
> I think users have to control the behavior of $dvipdf inside their
> latexmk config file; I have no idea how this should work (and don't want
> to investigate further). WDYT?
Yes, I think so, too. Without changing $dvipdf value, Latexmk calls
dvipdf, not dvipdfmx, in response to "-pdfdvi" option. Thus this
treatment is half-cooked. :-(
Maybe we should minimize the command option like
("LaTeXMK" "latexmk %(extraopts) %t"
TeX-run-format nil (LaTeX-mode docTeX-mode) :help "Run LaTeXMK")
and let the user to do all control over the option through .latexmkrc?
Regards,
Ikumi Keita
#StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine
#Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
