Hi Arash, >>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > Hi all, > I was looking through our old bugs and I saw bug#48144[1] which was > about LatexMK and the issue is resolved. Looking at auctex-latexmk > package[2], it seems dormant. Acc. to this message[3], the fix in > #48144 was helpful and adding LatexMK support to AUCTeX isn't hard. I > don't use LatexMK and don't have any idea how it works, but adding two > entries to `TeX-expand-list' and `TeX-command-list' should be doable.
> What do others think? Is there a market for this addition? I'm fine with your idea. AUCTeX already has plenty of supplementary entries in `TeX-command-list', so it would be good to have another one :-) Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW
