Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > Yes, this is indeed an approach, my only concern is that we use > `completing-read' a lot but barely pass REQUIRE-MATCH for usual macros, > so is there a need for this inside these functions? I don't have a > strong opinion on this.
Following up myself, I installed a change (658340b188) where I removed the 'nil t' part. We can switch if there is a request for it. Best, Arash
