Colin Baxter <[email protected]> writes: > Ok, I suppose for people who like that sort of this.
Of course, the whole in-buffer completion thingy is for people who like it. > If implemented then I hope it would be off by default. The in-buffer completion machinery in AUCTeX is available by default, it kicks in once you use it. It doesn't get in the way if you don't use it. And in general, the related functions are designed to return quickly. And file size doesn't really matter, other that during parsing. > I have many hundreds of labels in some TeX files and I would worry > that what you're proposing might slow down or hang my emacs. If you're using RefTeX you shouldn't notice a difference. My implementation uses `reftex-access-scan-info' which RefTeX does as well once used. > In any case, I generate random numbers to insert as labels, so > completion would be meaningless I think. Maybe I'm missing the point, but this is about referencing labels with \ref et al. So why is completion meaningless inside a referencing macro? I admit that RefTeX itself offers a much more powerful interface with `reftex-reference' bound to 'C-c )' Best, Arash
