Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita <[email protected]> writes:
>>>>>> Arash Esbati <[email protected]> writes: > > My concern is more on the phrase "in favor of a more flexible solution" 😉 > In my opinion, the current facility provided by > `TeX-insert-macro-default-style' is still kind of awkward and I hope > smarter solution. Smarter solution is always a good thing :-) Can you please elaborate a little what's awkward and you don't like? Until now, I understood that the different keybindings are not good. >> Would it make sense to say: > >> • C-u C-c C-e modifies the document >> • C-u C-u C-c C-e toggles the arguments query > >> ? > > Yes, it's another feasible treatment. However, a more uniform usage of > C-u is desirable. (C-u C-c C-m uses C-u once, while C-u C-u C-c C-e > does twice.) We could also add 'C-u C-u C-c C-m' to do the same thing as 'C-u C-c C-m' ;-) I don't have a strong opinion on 'C-u C-c C-m' since I've never used this feature a lot. 'C-u C-c C-e' is much more in my muscle memory. Best, Arash
