Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: > > Uwe Brauer <o...@mat.ucm.es> writes: > > > Yes, it is a nuisance. As a rule, you (as well as the responsible > > maintainer) will receive a scan with the signature of an FSF > > representative on it: the copyright assignment is a contract with > > requirements for both parties. > > > Sometimes stuff goes wrong or delays occur, not always readily > > explainable. > > Sorry to nag, but you seem a person to be sufficiently high «placed» in the > GNU/FSF hierarchy either to judge or to give advice.
Hm? I am not a member of the FSF at all. > Yesterday I wrote again the FSF clerk, Donald R. Robertson III, > complaining his missing reaction when I sent him the FSF copyright > papers, the 8th of August, however he still did not answer, do you > know how to proceed? Wait some more days. For one thing: if you wrote yesterday, yesterday was Sunday. Which is not a work day even in the U.S. (and Donald is an actual employee). And Monday is not half over in the U.S. since there is a timezone difference. And if he is not paid for mostly idling, he'll be working off a task queue. -- David Kastrup _______________________________________________ auctex-devel mailing list auctex-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/auctex-devel
